a sermon by John W. Wimberly, Jr.
Pastor, Western Presbyterian Church
Washington, D.C.
April 26, 2009
Text: Luke 24:36b-48
If we were Roman Catholics, the discussion would have started with the papal encyclical Evangelium Vitae which spells out church doctrine as related to human sexuality. If we were Jews, it would have started with the Torah and Talmud and then moved into a midrashic conversation. If we were Pentecostalists, we would have prayed and waited for the Holy Spirit to fill us with wisdom. But this past Tuesday night, it was about 300 Presbyterians who sat down to discuss and vote on our denomination’s position on homosexuality. So we started with a Bible study.
When it comes to understanding and knowing God, as Presbyterians, Scripture is our unique and authoritative starting point. Within the sacred text, we believe there is an answer to every question, a question for every answer. And so we probe it century after century.
God’s Word isn’t always immediately clear. But it is our calling and responsibility to find it. We know it is there.
To Presbyterians, searching Scripture seems obvious. But for many others, it seems outrageous. These folks ask, “How dare you proclaim a book to be the Word of God that is filled with so much racism, sexism, homophobia, not to mention R-rated sex and violence?” Indeed, our affirmation of Scripture can seem like a wild, almost bizarre affirmation. And yet affirm it we do.
Seminary produces some major faith crises. Some of them relate to self-questioning—who do I think I am trying to be a pastor? Some relate to our classmates—who do they think they are trying to be pastors? But for Presbyterians, the biggest crises usually relate to Scripture.
In seminary, we undergo the traumatic process of deconstructing the Bible. We learn how the texts began as collections of stories passed verbally from one person to the next for decades before being written down. We study how the text was transmitted and, at times, mangled by monastic scribes over the centuries. We analyze beloved texts using literary, historical, textual and source theory. By the end of this process, the text feels much more like the work of humans than the Word of God.
Frankly, some seminarians can’t deal with it. They run away from the process, returning to the original, very simple understandings of Scripture they brought to seminary. They sing, “Jesus loves me this I know because the Bible tells me so” as they sell their biblical studies textbooks. Other students become pretty jaded and cynical regarding the bible, seeing the text as hopelessly compromised by the human minds who wrote and interpreted it over the past two thousand years.
However, some students emerge from the process with a profoundly deepened love for the divine mystery the Holy Book is. We find Scripture to be a gift that can never be fully unwrapped. We learn that we can preach on the same text ten times and discover ten very different meanings to the passage.
During seminary, under the mentorship of a great biblical scholar named Dominic Crossan, I became so intrigued with the Bible that I almost did a Ph.D. in biblical studies. But when I spoke with a theology professor at the University of Chicago, David Tracy, he gave me a warning. In biblical studies, he said, I would have to learn so many languages that I wouldn’t have time to study much else. “We theologians,” he laughed, “need know only German!” It was a funny caricature of biblical scholars. But a large part of their time is devoted to languages and linguistical analysis. As a result, I chose to do my doctoral studies in systematic theology.
Despite the complexity of modern Biblical studies, the Bible remains as much a source of truth and wisdom for a peasant studying it in a small village in Kenya as it is for our highly educated bible students here at Western. In a direct and compelling way, open to any and all persons regardless of class or culture, the Bible reveals a very simple, redemptive message: God loves us—more than we know, more than we appreciate, more than we deserve.
There is a question I used to pose to my high school youth groups. If we dropped the bible on an island where the people lived in total isolation from the rest of humanity, would the people be able to read and understand the bible? I think the answer is “yes.”
However, many think the answer is “no.” They believe the Bible is so culturally rooted that it makes no sense without its cultural context. I disagree. The truth of God’s story shines brightly from the Bible no matter how much or how little we know about the book, no matter what our cultural starting point.
Would all the residents of that island come to believe in God? No. Would they all come to believe that Jesus is the Christ? No. But they would all be better people spiritually for having read the Bible.
Given Scriptures’ universal appeal and significance for our spiritual lives, why is it that so many Presbyterians, in this country, aren’t serious students of the Bible? Why don’t we have three or four ongoing bible studies here at Western instead of two or three? I’m not exactly sure. But I have a couple of thoughts on the matter.
First, most of us think the Bible is far more complicated than it is. In fact, it is a collection of various pieces of literature. The Gospels are short stories. Paul’s writing is a collection of letters. Acts of the Apostles is a brief history. Revelation is, well, revelation. The Old Testament is a collection of histories, short stories, legal writing, instructions on religious rituals and poetry.
Most of us read short stories, history and even collections of letters by famous people. But we don’t read the same in the Bible. We see the Good Book as somehow more complicated than other literature. It isn’t.
Second, we think the Bible is confusing. At times, it can be. The literature was written by and for people in another time and place. As a result, some of it just doesn’t make sense. When it doesn’t make sense, we have a choice. We can skim over the challenging parts or dig in and learn what the original intent was. The latter is better than the former. But it is not necessarily mandatory. Shakespeare is filled with all kinds of things that don’t make sense without a little study. However, many people continue to find meaning in the Bard’s work as they ignore the details and focus on the broad themes of the stories. It is possible to do the same with Scripture.
Third, there are things in the bible stories we find offensive so we don’t read them. We don’t want to think our God condones violence, misogyny, classism. Worried the Bible does, we stay away from it.
But we can’t engage in denial as to what does and does not exist in Scripture. When we encounter ungodly realities in Scripture, one option is to shut the book and walk away. Another option is to affirm the stories are, in fact, ungodly, contrary to God’s Word. To do so, we need to acknowledge the bible not only as the Word of God but also as reflecting the values and vices of the human beings who wrote it. As Christians, our job is to discern what is the Word of God and what is the word of humans in the sacred texts.
Fourth, we find the bible to be filled with major contradictions. On the one hand, it says “love your neighbor.” On the other hand, at times, it says people who don’t share our faith will burn in hell. On the one hand, it says “God so loved the world.” On the other hand, it describes the world as a huge temptation. Why would God love a temptation?
As I view Scripture, these contradictions are key to understanding the genius of God’s Word. The contradictions make it absolutely impossible to read Scripture literally. We can’t be God’s avenging warriors and God’s peacemakers at the same time. We can’t be filled with judgement and grace at the same time. We can’t accept a passage in Leviticus condemning homosexuality and simultaneously embrace Jesus’ inclusive approach to all people.
In other words, all of these contradictions force us to think…and pray…and think some more…and pray some more. We can’t just read the Word. We have to discern the Word. We have to make some choices about what parts of the Bible we will follow.
Were it not for Scripture’s contradictions, the Bible would be the most dangerous book in the world. Because without the contradictions, Christians could declare with absolute certainty and confidence that “such and such is God’s Way. No doubt about it. No further questioning needed. We know God’s will. Let’s go!”
And, of course, that is exactly what some Christians have done over the centuries. Such certainty about God’s will has produced crusades, pogroms and discrimination.
The contradictions in the Bible are not a curse. They are a blessing. They are intended to keep us humble. We cannot assume our interpretation of any one piece of Scripture is absolutely true because there is usually a passage in Scripture challenging our position.
At the Presbytery meeting on Tuesday, we tried something new. Rather than everyone going to microphones to debate the issue of ordaining LGBT folks, we started with a bible study around small tables. Listening to post-meeting comments from friends as well as the lengthy commentary on Facebook, it is clear the small table discussions changed positively the tone and tenor of the meeting from that of past meetings on this issue.
In a small group setting, we had to take seriously the biblical rationales for the differing positions around the table. Just as importantly, we had to take seriously the person making them. It didn’t change the vote. Our Presbytery did what we usually do, we supported the ordination of LGBT folks by a 2-1 margin (In a sign of significant movement, the overture lost only narrowly on a national level). But it did change the way we walked away from the meeting. There wasn’t the bitterness and hard feelings that oftentimes have accompanied these votes. It was replaced by a humble understanding that there are many ways to read the Good Book.
However, the fact that there are many ways to read Scripture does not mean that all interpretations are correct. As the church and as individual believers, we can and must come to some agreement of what Scripture broadly mandates and reveals. To do so, we read Scripture in search of its repeated, overarching themes and then apply those themes to our understanding of particular texts.
For example, Scripture has a strong theme about inclusion. Ranging from the Old Testament’s numerous mandates to treat foreigners and strangers kindly and justly to the New Testament’s story of God’s love spreading from Israel to the Gentile world, it is clear that God intends for us to build communities where everyone is welcomed and valued. Applying that broad theme of inclusion to the small number of homophobic passages in Scripture, a growing number of us conclude that the individual passages are reflective of a homophobic human society, not an inclusive, loving God.
Another example focuses on violence. There is an omnipresent Biblical theme rejecting violence, running from Cain and Abel to the teachings of Jesus. This is important context when we come across a verse where the author celebrates Israel’s victory over opponents by saying something like “And 20,000 of the Philistines were killed. Praise the Lord.” Employing the numerous biblical mandates to deal with each other nonviolently, I think we can safely view such passages as reflective of human values, not God’s Word.
So we use Scripture to judge Scripture, a principle advocated by John Calvin as well as many other theologians before and after him. We aren’t using changing, random cultural values to guide our changing understanding of Scripture, as is often charged. We are using broad Biblical values to particular verses of Scripture.
I am well aware that this is not a really uplifting sermon. But it is a very important sermon. As Presbyterians, we use the Bible as our authority. If we aren’t reading the bible on a regular basis, we make a mockery of our approach to faith. We might as well go back to the way things worked before the Reformation and allow clergy and Popes to decide the meaning of Scripture. At least, they are reading and thinking about it.
There is a fifth and especially irritating reason why we don’t read Scripture. We are spiritually undisciplined. That is a polite way of saying we are lazy. I don’t like saying it. But I can think of no other way to say it.
How much effort does it take to read a chapter of Scripture every night before we go to bed or every morning when we wake up? Reading a chapter a night, if we started with Matthew on January 1st, we would finish all the Gospels by the end of March.
“But it is filled with stuff we don’t understand,” we protest. How much effort does it take to ask Carol or me for the title of a good commentary to help with the reading? Not much.
A good friend of mine is the pastor of a large, conservative Presbyterian congregation. We were talking the other day and he said, “My biggest frustration is that my members don’t know the Bible.” I was stunned. I said, “I thought only members of liberal congregations didn’t know the Bible!”
Folks, there are no good reasons not to read Scripture daily. Gratefully, it is never too late to become a student of Scripture. I have known people who have started serious bible study in retirement. However, those who do start late always have the same comment, “I wish, oh how I wish, I had started earlier.”
As we celebrate the resurrection of Jesus, may we become a Bible-reading, Bible-centered people. It is our history. If we are to thrive as Christians, it must be our future.
Let us pray: Gracious God, you have given us your Word. Help us to find the time and energy to study it. As we do so, it will give us new energy and reorient the way we spend our time. All this we pray in Jesus’ precious Name. Amen.